SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8673

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KHERUNISHA ALIAS KAIRUN NISHA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMARI GIRI AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Reserved on:- 12.12.2025

Pronounced on:- 18.12.2025 Uploaded on :- 19.12.2025

KHERUNISHA ALIAS KAIRUN NISHA & ORS. ......Appellants

vs.

RAJ KUMARI GIRI AND ORS. ......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate

Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate

for respondent No.1 and 2.

Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate

for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

CM-7153-CII-2025

1. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act,

1963 for condonation of delay of 2895 days in filing the appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant would

not ask for interest for the delayed period.

3. Notice in the application.

4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and 2 and Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3 and contends that they have no

objection if the application is allowed.

5. For the reasons mentioned in the application for condonation of delay which is supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed.

6. The delay of 2895 days in filing t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top