SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8712

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LUCKY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Lucky ... Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana ... Respondent

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 01.12.2025 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 17.12.2025 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 17.12.2025

website

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full

pronounced or whether the full judgment is

pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable

judgment, and reasons thereof

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Present: Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate,

Mr. Dinesh Chaudhary, Advocate and

Er. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the complainant.

...

MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL)

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.38 dated

31.01.2025, registered under Sections 308(2), 318(4), 319, 336(3), 338, 340 of the BNS (Sections 61(2), 3(5), 241 of the BNS and Sections 66C, 66D of the Information Technology Act were added later on),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top