IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Reserved on: 11.11.2025

Pronounced on : 17.12.2025

Uploaded on: 19.12.2025

M/s Ramnprastha Estate Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner

V/s

Ankit and others …Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Argued by: Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate and Mr. Uday Vij, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate,

for respondents No.4, 5, 7, 11 to 13, 15, 16 and 17(i), 17(v),

17(vi) and 17(vii).

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J

The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, assails the order dated 26.09.2024 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Gurugram, vide which order dated 12.11.2021 striking off the defence of the respondents-defendants on account of non-filing of the written statement was recalled and the respondents-defendants were permitted to file written statements subject to

payment of Rs.1000/- as costs by each of them.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts emerging from the petition are that a suit for declaration and specific performance with consequential relief of permanent injunction was instituted by the petitioner- plaintiff (M/s Ramnprastha Estate Pvt. Ltd. ) (hereinafter