SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8745

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HEMANT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


(228) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of decision : 15.12.2025

HEMANT

... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA (ORAL)

Present: Mr. Harpal Singh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana

****

MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.006 dated 20.03.2024 registered under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC at Cyber

Crime Police Station, Rewari.

2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the complainant-Pankaj Saini alleging that through Facebook link, he came into contact with one Schroders Capital Institution Trading Services Company (for short “Company”) and was induced to make investments in stock market on the premise that he would be earning handsome profits. He was made to part with an amount of Rs.18.5 lakhs in six instalments. On 19.02.2024, the operator

of the above-mentioned company instructed the complainant to invest more money by saying that the minimum requirement was of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top