IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

211

CRM-M-49725-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.01.2026

Sarvar

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

*****

Present : Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana

*****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.177 dated 05.06.2024, registered under Sections 379-B, 392, 120-B, 201 IPC and 25 of Arms Act at

Police Station IMT, Rohtak, District Rohtak.

2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for 1 year and about 7 months. He alleges false implication. There is no CCTV footage of the place of incident. No test identification parade was conducted. Out of 12 prosecution witnesses, only 5 including the complainant have been examined, who did not identify the petitioner. The petitioner is involved in 1 more case, wherein he is on bail. Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by Hon'ble The Supreme Court titled as Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State

of U.P. and others, 2012(2) SCC 382

3. The custody certificate dated 06.01.2026, file