SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 162

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GAUTAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


220

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Gautam

….Petitioner

versus

State of Punjab ….Respondent

Date of decision: January 13, 2026

Date of Uploading: January 13, 2026

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:- Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG Punjab.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.74 dated 06.04.2022, for the offence punishable under Sections 379-B & 34 of the IPC, 1860 (Section 411 of IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Rama Mandi, District

Jalandhar.

2. The gravamen of allegations against the petitioner is that Brijesh Kumar, son of Paras Nath, stated that on 05.04.2022, at about 1:30 PM, he was travelling from Lama Pind Chowk towards Kishanpura Chowk in a three-wheeler driven by his friend Gurnek Singh. He was seated on the front seat and was holding his Redmi mobile phone in his hand. When they

reached near the shop of Dr. Bawa, two unknown persons with short-cut hair approached them from behind on a Pulsar motorcycle. The pillion rider suddenly sn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top