SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 164

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of decision: 13.01.2026

Date of uploading: 13.01.2026

Suraj Singh ....Petitioner

V/s

State of Punjab

....Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present: Mr. Anterpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, Punjab.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition is second petition preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS 2023 for grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.62 dated 06.08.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959, at Police Station Punjab Agriculture University (PAU), District

Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana.

2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out by the

petitioner in the present petition) is as follows:-

“Statement of Ravi Kumar Bholu s/o Smt. Anita Rani resident of house no. 122 Corporation Colony Panj pir road Ludhiana, police station P.A.U Ludhiana aged around 24 years. Stated that I am doing work of finance with Soma property dealer, Rishi Nagar 2 Block Ludhiana, Where I often used to go to the house of Bhupinder Singh, owner of Soma property dealer. During that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top