SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 168

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


222

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Amit Kumar ….Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana

….Respondent

Date of decision: January 13, 2026

Date of Uploading: January 13, 2026

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present:- Mr. Anil Ghangas, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.86 dated 04.03.2025, for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short ‘Arms Act’), under Sections 109(1), 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 191(3) & 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 (Sections 61, 238(b) of BNS added later on), registered at Police

Station Sadar Hansi, Hisar, District Hisar.

2. The gravamen of allegations against the petitioner is that injured, namely, Pooja stated that on 03.03.2025, she, along with her sister Sonia, went on her scooty bearing registration No.HR-20AV-8538 to visit her son at the school. However, the school authorities informed her that

Jassi’s grandfather had instructed them not to allow anyone to meet the child. The school autho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top