SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TEJINDER SINGH FAUJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Prayer in the present petitions filed under Sections 483 of

BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.38 dated 06.04.2022, registered at Police Station Urban Estate Patiala, under

Sections 302, 148, 149 and 34 IPC, Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59-A of the Arms Act.

2. Short reply in CRM-M-61972-2024, filed by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, City-2, District Patiala, is taken on record.

3. Learned Senior Counsel in CRM-M-61972-2024 and learned counsel in Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by Hon'ble The Supreme Court titled as Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012(2)

SCC 382

4. The custody certificates dated 12.01.2026, filed by the learned State counsel are taken on record. As per the same, the petitioners are behind bars for 3 years, 8 months and 20 days.

5. Learned State counsel and learned Senior Counsel for the complainant oppose the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioners of having opened fire on the deceased and others with a premeditated mind. However, they are unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case and and the co-

accused having been re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top