IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

(139)

Date of Decision:-13.01.2026

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. AND OTHERS

… Petitioners

Versus

DAVINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER

... Respondents

****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:- Mr. I.S. Kooner, Advocate

for the petitioners.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present petition, invoked under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invites the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court for examining the legality, propriety, and jurisdictional soundness of the order dated 11.11.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar. By the said order, the learned Trial Court has allowed the respondent/plaintiff to amend the plaint by taking recourse to the provisions of Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for

short, ‘CPC’).

2. Succinctly stated, the respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for declaration, seeking a pronouncement that the report of the Internal Committee is illegal, null and void, having been rendered in breach of the principles of natural justice. A further prayer for permanent injunction was sought to restrain the petitioners/defendants from effecting termination