SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAVEEN DAHIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP-67-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 12.01.2026

Naveen Dahiya

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present: Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pass a speaking order on the proposals dated 14.11.2019 (Annexure P-5) and dated 31.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) and consider the petitioner for the post of Chief

Engineer as advertised vide letter dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure P-7).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner, a qualified B.E. in Electronics and Communications, was duly appointed as Assistant Engineer (Instrumentation) in the year 2013 after the statutory service rules were amended in the year 2012 to include his discipline as an eligible qualification, however, a service anomaly has arisen inasmuch as the very same amended qualification has not been incorporated in the eligibility cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top