IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

CR-9418-2025 (O&M)

Decided on :- 12.01.2026

Dharampal Mehmi ....Petitioner

VERSUS

Sushma Rani ....Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Sumeet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J.

1. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner– tenant Dharampal Mehmi, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana, whereby the application moved by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC seeking amendment of the written statement in Rent Petition No. 516 of 2019 titled

‘Sushma Rani vs. Dharampal Mehmi’ has been dismissed.

2. It is pleaded that during the pendency of the rent petition and particularly during the cross-examination of the petitioner–landlord, certain facts have come on record which were not earlier within the knowledge of the applicant and which, according to him, go to the root of the matter. It is averred that the petitioner–landlord appeared as PW-1 and during her cross-examination admitted that she is