IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

(149)

CR-9554-2025

Date of Decision: - 12.01.2026

Raj Kishan alias Rajkishan and others

....Petitioners

Versus

Parveen

.....Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:- Mr. Amit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside/quashing the impugned order dated 01.08.2025 passed by the JMIC-cum-Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, whereby opportunity of petitioners/defendants to

cross-examine PW1 and PW2 was treated nil.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the respondent who is the son-in-law of petitioners No.1 and 2 and brother- in-law of the petitioners No.3 and 4 had filed a suit for declaration and for compensation and damages. It is further submitted that in the said case, the issues were framed on 11.11.2024 and the case was adjourned to 10.12.2024 for evidence of the plaintiff on which date no plaintiff witness was present and the case was adjourned to 20.01.2025. It is submitted that even on 20.01.2025 no plaintiff witness was present and the matter was adjourned to 21