SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 260

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALTEJ SINGH DHILLON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

133 CRM-13183-2019 in/&

CRR-997-2019

Date of decision: 12.01.2026

Date of uploading: 12.01.2026

Baltej Singh Dhillon

....Applicant/Petitioner

V/s

State of Punjab and another

....Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present: Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with

Mr. H.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

CRM-13183-2019

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 109 days in filing the accompanying revision petition. The main revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 15.09.2018, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala dismissing the appeal preferred by the State of Punjab, acquitting the respondent No.2 from the charges. The applicant- petitioner, by way of instant revision petition, impugns the abovesaid

judgment.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-petitioner, while seeking grant of prayer for condonation of delay of 109 days, has argued that

the applicant–petitioner had applied for the certified copies of the impugned judgment well within the prescribed period. However,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top