SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 269

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DALBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
MAKHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

DALBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER

......Appellants

Vs.

MAKHAN SINGH AND ANR.

......Respondents

Reserved on: 19.12.2025

Date of decision: 12.01.2026

Uploaded on: 13.01.2026

Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present: Mr. Naveen Siwach, Advocate (through v.c.)

for the appellants.

Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate

for respondent No.2.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 03.02.2020 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellants/claimants to the tune of Rs.17,22,800/- along with interest @ 7% per annum on account of death of deceased Meenu @ Parveen in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on

03.07.2016.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top