SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 330

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
MEENAKSHI AND OTHERS – Respondent


SUMAN AND ANOTHER V/S. MEENAKSHI AND OTHERS

Present: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate and

Mr. Anshuman Sethi, Advocate for

the applicant/petitioners.

*****

Present Review Application under Section 114(b) read with

Order 47 and Section 94(e) & Section 151 of CPC has been filed seeking review of judgment/order dated 01.12.2025; vide which the Civil Revision No. 2191 of 2023 filed by the review-applicant laying challenging to the dismissal of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, had been

dismissed.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the review- applicant that although all submissions made by the learned counsel at time of hearing of the Civil Revision petition have been duly noted/recorded in the order dated 1.12.2025; however, it is contented that the judgment dated 01.12.2025 does not deal with and decide many important issues which were urged at the time of hearing. To buttress his submission, learned counsel submits that in para 14 of the judgment/order dated 01.12.2025, it has been wrongly noted by this Court that “the petitioners had already exhausted their remedy of filing application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by way of their first application dated 19.08.2021 (An

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top