SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM RICHH PAUL KAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision : 08.01.2026

Ram Richh Paul Kakar …..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ....Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

Present : Mr. Karan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, D.A.G., Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 05.12.2023 (Annexure P-10), whereby the respondents have granted the benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme on completion of eight years and nine years of service to the petitioner by taking his date of confirmation in Punjab Forest Service (Class-II) w.e.f. 01.09.2002 instead of ad hoc promotion date, whereas the junior to the petitioner stands promoted and confirmed w.e.f. 25.07.2000 i.e. the date of ad-hoc promotion and as such the respondents have created pay anomaly. Further, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to decide the representations dated 29.08.2023 & 21.03.2024 (Annexures P-8 & P-9) submitted by the petitioner in a time bound manner; to consider th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top