SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 346

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KELA DEVI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
M/S SANGRUR FERTILIZER AND CHEMICALS AND ANR – Respondent


210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of decision : 08.01.2026

KELA DEVI AND ORS ....Appellants

Versus

M/S SANGRUR FERTILIZER AND CHEMICALS AND ANR

....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present : Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Man Mohan, Advocate

for respondent No.1.

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

CM-15352-CII-2019 in CM-15354-CII-2019

This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation

Act, seeking condonation of delay of 2010 days in filing the application

under Order XLI Rule 19 CPC for restoration of the main appeal.

2. Reply to the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act

has been filed. The same is taken on record.

3. LRs of the deceased/employee are before this Court seeking modification of the order dated 05.11.2012 passed by the Commissioner under Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (now known as Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 and hereafter referred to as ‘1923 Act’) whereby though the compensation has been awarded to the claimants, but no order

has been passed qua interest and penalty in terms of Section 4A of 1923 Act.

4. The appeal was initially filed after a delay of 86 days. However, the same was dismissed on 9t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top