SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 383

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Shankar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Kunal Dawar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shashikant Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana.

Ms. Shreya Bublani, Advocate for the complainant.

MANISHA BATRA, J.

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 176 dated 01.10.2023, registered under Sections 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 379-B, 452, 506 of IPC (Sections 325, 120-B and 201 of IPC added later on) at Police Station Tigaon, Faridabad.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the complaint of complainant Rajesh filed on 01.10.2023 alleging therein that on the same day, he along with his family members was present in his house. At about 08:30 AM, Rakesh Sharma, Rajesh Sharma, Ramesh, Dhanesh, Sandeep, Kallu, Sonu, Mohit son of Dhanesh, Gajender, Naveen, Karambir Sharma, wife of Rakesh Sharma, wife of Dhanesh, wife of Ramesh and son

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top