SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 388

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAVI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

107-A Date of decision : 23.01.2026 Date of uploading : 23.01.2026 Ravi Kumar ………….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sahil Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:2)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:8)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:7)(cid:14)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:14)(cid:4)(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:12)(cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:18)(cid:3)

Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant.

---

SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)

1. Application CRM No.2574 of 2026, for placing on record amended head note and amended prayer clause in the main petition has been filed.

Heard. The same is allowed. Amended head note and amended prayer clause is taken on record.

1.1 Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.10 dated 1.3.2025 under Sections 140(2), 127(2), 115(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Sections 190, 191(3) of BNS added later on), registered at Police Station Rawalpindi, Phagwara, District Kapurthala.

2. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top