SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 390

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MOHD HARUN ALIAS MOHAMMAD HAROON ALIAS MOHD HAROON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mohd. Harun alias Mohammad Haroon alias Mohd. Haroon ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Sonal Singh Godara, Advocate, for the petitioner (through VC)

Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

***

MANISHA BATRA , J.

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in the FIR mentioned below:-

FIR No. Date Police Station Sections

334 12.11.2024 Cyber Crime Police318(4), 61(2) and 241 of Station, Gurugram,the Bharatiya Nyaya District Gurugram Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNS”) and 66D of IT Act, 2000

2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written complaint submitted by the complainant Pawan Goyal alleging therein that he was made a victim of cyber fraud by some unknown persons, who by alluring him to earn profits on shares, had involved him in trading of shares through Zerodha App and had caused wrongful loss to the tune of Rs.1,15,40,000/-. After

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top