SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 437

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARMEL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE PEPSU TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1555-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 22.01.2026 Harmel Singh ....Petitioner Versus The Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate with Mr. U.M. Khan, Advocate for the respondents.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to promote the petitioner as Inspector from the date his juniors have been promoted with all consequential benefits. Further a writ of certiorari has been sought, for quashing the order dated 25.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

2. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner joined the respondent/Corporation as a Driver on 01.10.2002 and has completed the eligibility criteria for promotion to the post of Inspector, which requires Matriculation and seven years of service. The seniority list dated 16

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top