123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:22.01.2026 MANJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs.

RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocate for the petitioners.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. ( Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to assail the impugned order dated 11.12.2025 (Annexure P-5), passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)-I, SAS Nagar. Vide the said order, the learned Executing Court allowed the application filed by the decree- holders seeking permission to place on record the correct affidavit along with the requisite stamp paper in compliance with the order dated 07.03.2025, and to replace the earlier stamp paper.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that no opportunity of being heard was afforded to him prior to the disposal of the said application and that the same was allowed without issuing any notice to the petitioner, thereby resulting in a violation of the principles of natural justice.

3. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone t