SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HAKAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KANTA DEVI SINCE DECEASED THROGH LRS AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (123)

Date of Decision:-22.01.2026 Hakam Singh ……Petitioner Versus Kanta Devi (Since Deceased) through her LRs and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present: Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of the impugned orders dated 09.12.2025 (Annexure P-9) and 03.01.2026 (Annexure P-10), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guhla, District Kaithal, whereby conditional warrants against the petitioner have been issued.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents/plaintiffs had filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 29.03.2016 and the said suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 09.12.2024. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal. He further submits that there was a delay of 104 days in filing the appeal, for which the petitioner has filed an application for condon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top