SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
OM PARKASH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :- 12.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-22.01.2026 Uploaded on:-23.01.2026 Om Parkash and Others … Appellants Versus Har Pal Singh and Others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate;

Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate and Ms. Anavi, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the caveators/respondents.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs assailing the concurrent judgments and decrees rendered by the learned Courts below, on the grounds that such findings are vitiated by errors of law, misappreciation of evidence, and manifest legal infirmities warranting interference by this Court in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction.

2. Briefly stated, the appellants–plaintiffs instituted the present suit seeking a declaratory decree, accompanied by consequential relief of permanent injunction, contending that the defendants have been wrongly recorded as co-owners of the suit land as fully detailed in the plaint. It is asserted that the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top