IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SAINIK SCHOOL KUNJPURA & ORS – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** ****
Pawan Kumar ... Petitioner VS.
Sainik School Kunjpura, Karnal & Ors. ... Respondents ****
1. Judgment reserved on 06.11.2025 2. Judgment pronounced on 21.01.2026 3. Judgment uploaded on 22.01.2026
4. Whether operative or full judgment Full 5. Delay in pronouncement of full judgment and reasons, if any NA ****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL ****
Present: Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. BS Bedi, Advocate for respondents No.1&2 Mr. Padam Kant Dwivedi, Advocate and Ms. Ayushi, Advocate for respondent No.3 ****
Sandeep Moudgil, J.
(1). The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, for issuing a writ of certiorari for setting aside order of the appointment of respondent No.3 and directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner to the post of Assistant Master (Hindi)
after correcting the merit list.
(2). The petitioner had earlier been appointed as Assistant Master (Hindi) on contractual/temporary basis with effect from 01.11.2014 and continued to work as such and his services were allowed to be continued from time to time. Thereafter, the post of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.