SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 514

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARDEEP SINGH ATWAL – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA ETC. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HARDEEP SINGH ATWAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS BANK OF INDIA ETC.

....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL.

Present: Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate with for the petitioner.

Mr. K.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate for respondent/Bank.

****

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J Prayer

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the findings of the Inquiry Officer vide order (Annexure P-6) and the order of punishment dated 05.07.1996 (Annexure P-8) vide which the petitioner has been dismissed from service and the appellate order dated 13.01.1997 (Annexure P-10) by which the said penalty has been confirmed by respondent No.3.

T he Conspectus Of Facts

2. The petitioner, a citizen of India, was working as an Assistant Manager/Staff Officer at Bank of India, Gaggo Mahal Branch, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. While in service, he was served with a charge-sheet dated 21.03.1995 (Annexure P-1) containing three articles of charge relating to alleged unauthorised transactions in Saving Bank Account No. 5950, availing of a consumer loan in the name of another staff member

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top