SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 522

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VINOD KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate with Ms. Monika Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

****

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

This Civil Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 12.03.2004 (Annexure P-3) and also quashing the Impugned order dated 06.03.2017 (P-9) whereby claim of the petitioner has been rejected without considering the Judgment of the high court and the judgment of the Supreme Court and also without considering the judgment dated 19.08.2004 passed by the High Court in CWP No. 1998 of 2003 because the petitioner was similar situated person passed by the Superintending Engineer P.W.D Hisar i.e. respondent no. 3, whereby the services of the petitioner has been regularized w.e.f. 01.10.2003 instead of 01.02.1996 and also quashing the order dated 06.03.2017 (P-9) passed by the respondent no.2 i.e Enginee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top