IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-217-2026 Date of decision: 21.01.2026 Shamshad Ahmed ...Pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oner Versus Sagir Hussain and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Himanshu Puri, Advocate for the pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oner.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

The pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Malerkotla, whereby his applica(cid:28)on seeking stay of the execu(cid:28)on proceedings (cid:28)ll the decision of his applica(cid:28)on under Order IX Rules 7 and

13 CPC read with Sec(cid:28)on 151 CPC has been dismissed.

2. A perusal of the record reveals that respondent No.1 had filed a pe(cid:28)(cid:28)on under Sec(cid:28)on 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restric(cid:28)on Act, 1949, seeking evic(cid:28)on of the tenants, namely the present pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oner and proforma respondents. The tenants were duly served in the evic(cid:28)on pe(cid:28)(cid:28)on, on 11.12.2024; however, they failed to appear and were consequently proceeded against ex parte. The ejectment pe(cid:28)(cid:28)on was allowed vide ex parte order dated 2