278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 21.01.2026 Vinod Kumar ... Petitioner Versus Shish Pal (since deceased) through LRs ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

1. Present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.07.2019 vide which the application filed by the petitioner under Order XXI Rule 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been dismissed. 2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that one Maha Singh filed a suit for recovery against defendant-respondent namely, Shish Pal (since deceased now represented by his legal representatives). Vide judgment and decree dated 27.01.2011 the suit was decreed in favour of Maha Singh. In execution, the property comprised in Khewat No.196/180 Khatauni No.247 Rect. No.121 Killa No.8, 11, 12, 13 18 and 19 situated within the revenue estate of village Patti Kaisth Seth, Teshil and District Kaithal to the extent of 7/761 share of Shish Pal (defendant-respondent) was put to auction through Court. The petitioner herein was th