SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 548

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GULZAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAMJI LAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :- 16.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-21.01.2026 Uploaded on:-22.01.2026 Gulzar Singh and Others … Appellants Versus Ramji Lal (since deceased) through his LRs ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Abishai A. George, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate and Ms. Anvai Parnami, Advocate for the respondents.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. Commencing with a formulation designed for judicial clarity and precision, it is pertinent to note at the outset that the present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs, assailing the legality, propriety, and correctness of the judgment and decree dated 04.03.1994 rendered by the learned District Judge, Kurukshetra, whereby the findings of the trial Court were affirmed in their entirety. The trial Court, vide judgment and decree dated 07.03.1992 passed by the learned Sub-Judge Ist Class, Kurukshetra, had dismissed the suit instituted by the appellants/plaintiffs se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top