IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BHAG RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhag Ram ....Applicant/Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondents Date of decision: 21.01.2026 Date of uploading: 21.01.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.
Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana.
None for respondent No.2.
*****
SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)
CRM-12183-2015
1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 980 days in filing the accompanying revision petition. The main revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 21.05.2012, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad setting aside the order of conviction passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehabad dated 13.08.2009 against respondent No.2 (herein).
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-petitioner, while seeking grant of prayer for condonation of delay of 980 days, has argued that the delay has occurred on account of the fact that the applicant came to know about the acquittal only in the month of December, 2012. Thereafter, the applicant approached the learned State Counse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.