SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 564

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JOG DHIAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SURENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 21.01.2026 Jog Dhian and another ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Surender Kumar and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ashit Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Maneet Kaushik, Advocate for the appellants.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The present appeal has been filed by the claimants against the dismissal of their claim petition by the learned MACT, Kurukshetra (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’), vide Award dated 12.02.2019 passed in MACP Case No. 259 dated22.07.2015 filed under Sections 166/140 and 141 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). The 2 claimants are the parents of the deceased Sumit, who was

24 years old at the time of accident.

2. It was the pleaded case of the appellants before the learned Tribunal that deceased Sumit had died due to the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 27.05.2015 due to the rash and negligent driving of a Car bearing registration No.HR-07V-3303 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”) being driven and owned by respondent No.1; and insured by respondent No.2. However, learned l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top