SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 608

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LATIKA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
VIKRAM SHARMA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (i) TA-316-2024 (O&M)

Smt.Latika Sharma ...Applicant VERSUS Vikram Sharma ...Respondent (ii) TA-1605-2024 (O&M)

Smt.Latika Sharma and others ...Applicants VERSUS Vikram Sharma ...Respondent Date of Decision: January 21, 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Nikhil Chopra, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr.Sachin Kalia, Advocate for the respondent.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

The applicant-wife has filed these two transfer applications, for seeking transfer of the pending litigation between the parties.

TA-316-2024 has been filed for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act bearing No.HMA-117-2024, titled ‘Vikram Sharma vs. Latika Sharma’ and TA-1605-2024 has been filed for seeking transfer of the civil suit bearing No.CS-11378-2024 titled ‘Vikram Sharma vs. Latika Sharma and others’. Both the aforesaid litigations are pending in the Courts at Ludhiana and applicant seeks transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Jalandhar.

In pursuance of the notice issued, the respondent made appearance through counsel. However, counsel for the respondent has made a statement that he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top