SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 638

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
OVINDER SOOD AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SHIVDARSHAN KAUR AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (119)

Date of Decision:-20.01.2026 OVINDER SOOD AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus SHIVDARSHAN KAUR AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rohit Kataria, Advocate, and Mr. Mann K. Bhandari, Advocate, for the petitioners.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The instant civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 19.12.2025, whereby the learned Trial Court has declined the restoration of the electricity supply of the shop in question.

2. Petitioners are the tenant under respondents up to 31.10.2027 and he is running a business of operating cold storage for storing vegetables and fruits. Respondents in order to evict the petitioners in illegal manner filed eviction petition, which is pending adjudication. Respondents illegally got the electricity supply connection disconnected despite petitioner paying electricity charges in time.

3. Being aggrieved, petitioners filed civil suit along with an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC seeking directions to respondents to restore the electricity and for restraining res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top