SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 641

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARBANS SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MEGH RAJ JINDAL AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-321-2026 Date of Decision: 20.01.2026 HARBANS SINGH ......... Petitioner Versus MEGH RAJ JINDAL AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Ankit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral)

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.10.2025 (Annexure P-11) passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Samana, District Patiala, vide which the defence of defendant No.2/petitioner has been struck off on account of his failure to file the written statement.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the material placed on the file.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the delay in filing the written statement was not intentional and was rather beyond the control of the petitioner. His younger son namely Amandeep Singh, who had been impleaded as defendant No.3, had died and the petitioner was, thus, under stress for a long time and could not contact his counsel to file the written statement. Learned counsel further contended that even his counsel did not inform him, who infact was earlier e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top