IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Lalu Ram @ Lallu Ram . . . . Pe&&oner Vs.

Anisha Modi . . . . Respondents II. CR-4159-2025 (O&M) Raj Kumar . . . . Pe&&oner Vs.

Anisha Modi . . . . Respondents ****

Reserved on: 14.01.2026 Pronounced on: 20.01.2026 Pronounced fully/opera&ve part: Fully ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Argued by:- Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate for the pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oner.

Mr. Lakshay Bector, Advocate for the respondent.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

This order shall dispose of two revision pe(cid:28)(cid:28)ons men(cid:28)oned in the (cid:28)tle, as both arise out of similarly worded orders passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana and the learned Appellate Authority, Ludhiana, in two sep-

arate ejectment pe(cid:28)(cid:28)ons concerning the same premises.

2. In both ma)ers, the pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oner before the Rent Controller is the same landlady, namely Smt. Anisha Modi (respondent herein), whereas the re- spondents before the Rent Controller, namely, Lalu Ram @ Lallu Ram and Raj Kumar (pe(cid:15)(cid:15)oners herein), are tenants occupying two separate rooms in the same property.

3. For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from CR No.