IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARNAIK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CHARANJIT SINGH TOOR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-9633-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-19.01.2026 CR-9633-2025 (126)
HARNAIK SINGH … Petitioner Versus CHARANJIT SINGH TOOR ... Respondent CR-9763-2025 (126.1)
HARKARAN SINGH … Petitioner Versus SATWANT KAUR AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner in both the petitions.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)
1. Petitioners, who are brothers, have filed the present petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, where they have assailed the order dated 01.11.2025, whereby the learned Civil Judge has allowed the application of the respondents under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) and has directed the petitioner to pay the requisite court fee on the amount of sale deed. Petitioner(s) have filed a civil suit for grant of declaration that he is co-owner in joint possession of suit property and the sale deed dated 19.02.2013 is forged, fabricated, null and void without any sale consideration and is not binding upon the rights of the plaintiffs and mutation sanctioned on the basis of sale deed is also illegal, null and void and for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.