SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 719

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARNAIK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CHARANJIT SINGH TOOR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-9633-2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision:-19.01.2026 CR-9633-2025 (126)

HARNAIK SINGH … Petitioner Versus CHARANJIT SINGH TOOR ... Respondent CR-9763-2025 (126.1)

HARKARAN SINGH … Petitioner Versus SATWANT KAUR AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner in both the petitions.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. Petitioners, who are brothers, have filed the present petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, where they have assailed the order dated 01.11.2025, whereby the learned Civil Judge has allowed the application of the respondents under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) and has directed the petitioner to pay the requisite court fee on the amount of sale deed. Petitioner(s) have filed a civil suit for grant of declaration that he is co-owner in joint possession of suit property and the sale deed dated 19.02.2013 is forged, fabricated, null and void without any sale consideration and is not binding upon the rights of the plaintiffs and mutation sanctioned on the basis of sale deed is also illegal, null and void and for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top