IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 29.01.2026 BALBIR SINGH (DECEASED) THR LR .... Petitioner VERSUS M/S VIKRAM ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 06.10.2018 whereby the application filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 for examining of a handwriting and fingerprint expert in rebuttal evidence was allowed.

2. Briefly the facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff- respondent No.1 filed a suit for recovery on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 29.07.2006. The agreement to sell did not form part of the documents appended with the plaint. A written statement was filed, a copy of the agreement to sell was attached by the defendant-petitioner herein, wherein it was stated that name of the purchaser was not filled in. Issues were framed. Thereafter an application was filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.