SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HAZARA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
JIWAN RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :-21.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-28.01.2026 Uploaded on:-28.1.2026 Hazara Singh and another … Appellants Versus Jiwan Ram (deceased) through his LRs ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Hem Raj Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate for the respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (for short “RSA”) has been instituted by the appellants–defendants to assail the judgment and decree dated 20.03.1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala, whereby the findings returned by the trial Court were unreservedly affirmed. The trial Court, vide its judgment and decree dated 19.05.1990 rendered by the learned Sub-Judge Ist Class, Rajpura, had decreed the respondent/plaintiff’s suit for possession. The appellants now question the concurrent findings of both Courts below, asserting that the same are legally untenable and factually perverse.

2. At the very outset, it is asserted with utmost clarity that the plaintiff/respondent predicates his claim on his lawful ownership and possession of the suit property, whi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top