SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 854

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PUNJAB WAKF BOARD – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 28.01.2026 Punjab Wakf Board ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Satish Kumar and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts; whereby suit filed by the appellant for possession of the house situated in Satnam Nagar, Near New Grain Market Road, Jalandhar, comprised over area measuring 177.77 square yard existed over khasra no.944, khewat no.195, Khatauni no.217 to 220 (hereinafter referred to as “suit property”), as entered in the jamabandi of the year 2004-05, shown red in colour in site plan attached and bounded as: East: Wakf Property under the illegal possession of Tejinder Soap Factory; West: Street North: Wakf Property under the illegal possession of Kulwant Kaur; South: Wakf property under the illegal possession of Gurcharan Singh; and for recovery of mesne pro and for grant of permanent injunction, has been dismissed by both the Courts bel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top