IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 31.10.2025 Pronounced on : 28.01.2026 Uploaded on : 28.01.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes Renu Sharma ...... Appellant versus Satish Nagar and another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate Mr. Paramvir Singh, Advocate and Ms. Parneet Kaur, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate and Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Kansal, Advocate and Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate (through V.C.)

for respondent No.2.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J.

1. Plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved of concurrent judgment and decree passed by both the Courts below.

2. Plaintiff filed suit seeking decree of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 16.10.2008. As per plaintiff, defendant No.1 agreed to sell land measuring 06 kanal 12 marlas as detailed out in the headnote of the plaint (hereinafter referred to as the suit land) for a total sale consideration of Rs