IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 28.01.2026 Ashu ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Vijay Angrish and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. D.K.Sihag, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Ankit Saini, Advocate for respondent No.1.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-16052-C-2016 Prayer in this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for condonation of delay of 19 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

2. Heard.

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant/appellant, the same is allowed and delay of 19 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

RS A-6097- 2016 (O&M )

Plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts; whereby suit filed by the appellant for separate possession by way of partition and permanent injunction, has been dismissed by both the District Courts.

2. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No.1 in Court today is taken on record.

3. The pleaded case of the appellant in the plaint was that the plaintiff and defendants are real brother and sisters. The owner of the suit house, as described in the pl