IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Shikha Kamboj and ors. ......Appellants vs.

Deepak Kumar and ors. ......Respondents Date of Reserve: 22.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:28 .01.2026 Uploaded on:- 29.01.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Nitin Goswami, Advocate for Mr. Namit Khuranna, Advocate for the applicants-appellants. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for respondent No. 3.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J .

C.M. No. 5996-CII-2023

1. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 78 days in filing of the appeal

2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that appellant would not ask for interest for the delayed period. 3. Notice in the application.

4. On asking of the Court, Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and respondent No. 3 respectively and contends that they have no objection if the application is allowed.

5. For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 78