SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 871

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
OM PARKASH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SATBIR DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Om Parkash and anr. ......Appellants vs.

Satbir (deceased) through Lrs and ors. ......Respondents Date of Reserve: 23.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement: 28.01.2026 Uploaded on:- 29.01.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Palak Arora, Advocate for Mr. Jatin Verma, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Mr. Hrithik Sharma and Mr. Gopal Krishan, Advocate for respondent-Insurance Co.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J .

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 07.03.2020 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jind in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.10,02,200/- along with interest @7.5% per annum, on account of death of Asha in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 12.05.2017.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top