SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 896

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANVIRINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MANPARTAP SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 30.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 31.01.2026 Date of Uploading : 02.02.2026 Manvirinder Singh ......Petitioner Vs.

Manpartap Singh and others ......Respondents Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. M.S.Khaira, Senior Advocate, (through VC) with Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

None for respondent No.1.

Mr. R.M.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2 and 3.

****

S UDEEPTI SHARMA J .

1. The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the orders of even date dated 24.02.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala, in Execution No.33 of 2014. Further prayer is that directions be issued to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala/Executing Court to decide the execution application within time bound manner, as it is pending since 2014.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that execution application was filed in the year 2014 and till date, the same is not decided. He further contends that the judgment and decree in favour of the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top