SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 30.01.2026 NEK SINGH ...... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA ***

Present :- Mr. V. K. Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Neha Sonawane, DAG, Punjab.

***

Deepinder Singh Nalwa, J. (Oral)

1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the charge-sheets dated 08.07.2020 (Annexure P-2) and 21.07.2020 (Annexure P-3) issued to the petitioner after his retirement. It has also been prayed for a direction to the respondents to decide the suspension period of the petitioner from 25.07.2019 to 03.10.2019 and to grant him annual increment w.e.f. 01.01.2020. Further to release the retiral benefits along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the charge sheets dated 08.07.2020 (Annexure P-2) and 21.07.2020 (Annexure P-3) have already been decided by the department and appropriate punishments have been imposed vide order dated 09.09.2023 and 12.03.2024. At this stage, he submits that he is confining his arg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top