SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 913

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAI PARKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jai Parkash ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Jaspal Singh Pannu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate, For respondent No.4.

LAPITA BANERJI, J.

Prayer in the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is, inter-alia, for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the impugned order dated March 29, 2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Commissioner, Gurugram Division- respondent No.2, under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the “1948 Act”). The petitioner has furthermore sought correction of entries recorded in the Field Book of the jamabandis for the year 2016-17.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

i) The petitioner through his predecessors-in-interest has been in continuous possession of the land situated at Khewat No.320 Khatoni No.350 Killa No.35//6/2 in village Karoli, Sub Tehsil Nahar, Tehsil Kosli, District Rewari.

ii)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top