SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 916

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPESH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision 30.01.2026 RUPESH AND ANOTHER ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. A.G, Haryana.

Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.4.

*****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J .

1. By invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction vested in this Court by virtue of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, hereinafter being referred to as “Cr.P.C.”, the present petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.47 dated 02.04.2024 Police Station Machhroli, District Jhajjar. The above-said FIR has been lodged for the offences under Sections 323/427/447/506/34 of Indian Penal Code, hereinafter being referred to as ‘IPC’

only, 2. In nut-shell the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of Vinod son of Dalbir Singh, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the complainant that on 02.04.2024 at about 08.00 A.M., when complainant alongwith his son Divyans was harvesting mustard

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top