IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMAN ALIAS MUNSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-35755-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(217) CRM-M-35755-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision : 30.01.2026
AMAN @ MUNSHI
... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Rajesh Nain, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana
**** (cid:1)
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under
Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”)
for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.450 dated 31.10.2023
registered under Section 395 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police
Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad.
2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written
complaint submitted by the complainant-Manjeet on 31.10.2023 alleging that on
the same day he alongwith his cousin brother i.e. Deepu, was present in his
fields and both of them were proceeding to go back towards their houses on their
respective motorbikes, when 06 youths unknown to them reached there and
intercepted them. Two of them pointed pistols on the ear lobes of the petitioner
and his cousin brother asked them to hand over the keys of their motor bikes,
1 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 03-02-2026 15:44:57 :::
##PAGE2##CRM-M-35755-2025 (O&M) 2
otherwise they would be killed. Out of fear, the complainant and his cousin
brother handed over the keys of their vehicles to them and then all of them fled
away. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings were initiated. The
looted motorcycles were found lying abandoned in the area of Daulatpur,
District Hisar on 02.11.2023 and were taken into custody. During the course of
investigation, the petitioner who was arrested in some other case suffered a
disclosure statement admitting his involvement in this case and on the basis of
the same, he was joined into investigation of this case and was arrested on
28.05.2025. He was interrogated again and suffered disclosure statement
admitting the fact that he alongwith the co-accused had looted the motorcycles
from the complainant and his cousin brother. The names of other co-accused
were also disclosed. Test Identification Parade of the petitioner was got
conducted in the presence of the victim and he was duly identified by them. The
co-accused were subsequently arrested. Investigation now stands completed and
the petitioner alongwith the co-accused is facing trial for commission of
aforementioned offences.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in this case. He was not named in the FIR. No recovery has
been effected from him. The disclosure statement allegedly suffered by him is
not legally admissible in evidence and hence cannot be taken into consideration
especially in view of the fact that no distinct or new fact has been disclosed in
pursuance thereof. The trial will take considerable time to conclude since only
03 out of 31 witnesses have been examined so far. His involvement in other
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 03-02-2026 15:44:58 :::
##PAGE3##CRM-M-35755-2025 (O&M) 3
cases cannot be considered to be a reason for denying benefit of bail to him. It
is, thus, urged that he deserve to be released on bail.
4. Status report and custody certificate have been filed by respondent-
State. It is argued by learned State counsel that the allegations against the
petitioner are serious in nature as he was duly identified by the victims during
test identification parade. He is a man of criminal antecedents since as many as
09 cases have been registered against him and which are serious in nature.
There are chances of petitioner’s intimidating the witnesses committing similar
offences or absconding, if extended benefit of bail. It is, therefore, stressed that
the petition does not deserve to be allowed.
5. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by counsel for
both the parties.
6. The petitioner alongwith the co-accused is alleged to have robbed
the complainant and his cousin brother of thei
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.